Considering Barcelona's Spending
The user's message is in Chinese, stating that Barca should have invested Neymar's high transfer fee for long-term gains, which got wasted quickly. They didn't ask a question, but might be looking for a summary or analysis. I could discuss Barcelona’s spending post-Neymar sale, focusing on transfers like Dembélé, Coutinho, and Griezmann, many of which didn't yield good returns. I should also mention alternative investments like infrastructure and youth development. I'll keep it concise.Analyzing Barcelona’s Spending
I need to provide a concise analysis regarding whether Barca squandered the money from Neymar's transfer. Did they make impulsive decisions with players like Dembélé and Coutinho? It seems there were mistakes, like a lack of strategic planning and overpaying because the market knew they had money. Wage inflation and the amortization burden likely influenced Financial Fair Play limits, contributing to Messi's exit in 2021. Between 2017 and 2019, they spent around €300 million net, even after the €222 million from Neymar.Creating Barcelona's Investment Analysis
I need to keep my response compact, focusing on a timeline and the outcomes of Barcelona's spending. I'll suggest what long-term investments could have looked like, such as the stadium project, debt reduction, and youth academy development. I should note their attempts at long-term strategies, like signing de Jong, while highlighting losses from players like Dembélé and Coutinho.
I'll organize the information into a bullet list comparing "long-term investment options" versus "actual outcomes" and learning points. Since the user's message is in Chinese, I will translate the key points accordingly.
简单说:这话不夸张。巴萨拿到内马尔2.22亿欧后,并没做“长线投资”,而是很快在大额即战力引援和高薪上消耗掉了资本金,且投入产出比偏低。

发生了什么
长线投资本可怎么做
结果复盘
教训
如果你需要,我可以把2017-2020具体转入转出、摊销和工资占比做一张简表,对比“若做长线配置”的情景测算。